View source for Prabhupada 0441 - Krsna is the Supreme, and We Are Fragmental Parts

<!-- BEGIN CATEGORY LIST -->
[[Category:1080 English Pages with Videos]]
[[Category:Prabhupada 0441 - in all Languages]]
[[Category:EN-Quotes - 1968]]
[[Category:EN-Quotes - Lectures, Bhagavad-gita As It Is]]
[[Category:EN-Quotes - in USA]]
[[Category:EN-Quotes - in USA, Los Angeles]]
<!-- END CATEGORY LIST -->
<!-- BEGIN NAVIGATION BAR -- DO NOT EDIT OR REMOVE -->
{{1080 videos navigation - All Languages|English|Prabhupada 0440 - The Mayavadi Theory is that the Ultimate Spirit is Impersonal|0440|Prabhupada 0442 - In Christian Theology, one Prays to God, 'Give us our Daily Bread'|0442}}
<!-- END NAVIGATION BAR -->
<!-- BEGIN ORIGINAL VANIQUOTES PAGE LINK-->
<div class="center">
'''<big>[[Vaniquotes:Spiritually, eternally, the fragments are fragments, and the Supreme is Supreme. Krsna is the Supreme, and we are fragmental parts. We are fragments eternally|Original Vaniquotes page in English]]</big>'''
</div>
----
<!-- END ORIGINAL VANIQUOTES PAGE LINK-->

<!-- BEGIN VIDEO LINK -->
{{youtube_right|IeMJNi5weSE|Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme, and We Are Fragmental Parts<br/>- Prabhupāda 0441}}
<!-- END VIDEO LINK -->

<!-- BEGIN AUDIO LINK -->
<mp3player>https://s3.amazonaws.com/vanipedia/clip/681127BG.LA_clip7.mp3</mp3player>
<!-- END AUDIO LINK -->

<!-- BEGIN VANISOURCE LINK -->
'''[[Vanisource:Lecture on BG 2.8-12 -- Los Angeles, November 27, 1968|Lecture on BG 2.8-12 -- Los Angeles, November 27, 1968]]'''
<!-- END VANISOURCE LINK -->

<!-- BEGIN TRANSLATED TEXT -->
<p>Devotee: "The Supreme Personality of Godhead is the Supreme Individual Person, and Arjuna, the Lord's eternal associate, and all the kings assembled there are individual eternal persons. It is not that they did not exist as individuals in the past, and it is not that they will not remain as eternal persons. Their individuality existed in the past and their individuality will continue in the future without interruption. Therefore there is no cause for lamentation for any one of the individual living entities. The Māyāvādī or impersonal theory that after liberation the individual soul, separate on account of māyā or illusion, will merge into the impersonal Brahman without individual existence..."</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Now, the Māyāvādī says that this individuality is māyā. So their conception is that spirit, the whole spirit is a lump. Their theory is ghaṭākāśa poṭākāśa. Ghaṭākāśa poṭākāśa means... Just like sky. The sky is an expansion, impersonal expansion. So in a pot, in a waterpot, in a pitcher that is closed... Now, within the pitcher, there is also sky, a small sky. Now as soon as the pitcher is broken, the outside, the bigger sky, and the small sky within the pitcher mixes. That is Māyāvāda theory. But this analogy cannot be applied. Analogy means points of similarity. That is the law of analogy. The sky cannot be compared... The small sky within the pitcher cannot be compared with the living entity. It is material, matter. Sky is matter, and individual living entity is spirit. So how you can say? Just like a small ant, it is spirit soul. It has got its individuality. But a big dead stone, hill or mountain, it has no individuality. So matter has no individuality. Spirit has individuality. So if the points of similarity differ, then there is no analogy. That is the law of analogy. So you cannot analogize with matter and spirit. Therefore this analogy is fallacious. Ghaṭākāśa poṭākāśa. Then another evidence is in the Bhagavad-gītā. Kṛṣṇa says that mamaivāṁśo jīva-bhūta ([[Vanisource:BG 15.7 (1972)|BG 15.7]]). "This individual souls, they are My part and parcel." Jīva-loke sanātanaḥ. And they are eternal. That means eternally they are part and parcel. Then when... How this Māyāvāda theory can be supported, that due to māyā, being covered by māyā, they are now appearing individual, separate, but when the covering of māyā will be taken away, they will mix up just like the small sky within the pitcher and the big sky outside mixes? So this analogy is fallacious from logical point of view, as well as from authentic Vedic point of view. They are eternally fragments. There are many other evidences from Bhagavad-gītā. Bhagavad-gītā says that spirit cannot be fragmented. So if you say that by covering of māyā the spirit has become fragment, that is not possible. It cannot be cut. Just like if you cut one big piece of paper into small fragments, it is possible because it is matter, but spiritually it is not possible. Spiritually, eternally, the fragments are fragments, and the Supreme is Supreme. Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme, and we are fragmental parts. We are fragments eternally. These things are explained in Bhagavad-gītā in different places very nicely. I request you all to keep one copy of this Bhagavad-gītā, every one of you, and read it carefully. And there will be examination in the coming September. So... Of course, that is voluntary. But I request you to prepare for the examination next September. And one who will pass the examination will get the title Bhakti-śāstrī. Have you distributed that... Yes. Go on.</p>
<p>Devotee: "Nor is the theory that we only think of individuality in the conditioned state supported herein. Kṛṣṇa clearly says that in the future also the individuality of the Lord and others as it is..."</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Kṛṣṇa never says that after liberation these individual souls will mix up with the Supreme Soul. Kṛṣṇa never says in the Bhagavad-gītā.</p>
<!-- END TRANSLATED TEXT -->